《经济学家》读译参考:印度经济过热-欲赶超中国必先深化

admin管理员组

文章数量:1530980

2024年7月20日发(作者：)

　The world economy

　　India overheats

　　Feb 1st 2007

　　From The Economist print edition

India cannot run as fast as China without further reform

　　THE Indian tiger is on the prowl[1]. This week, in an apt piece of symbolism, Tata Steel, which dates back to the days of

the Raj, leapt into the league of top producers when it bought Britain's Corus, which includes the steelmaking remnants of the

old imperial power. Nor is Tata alone: younger Indian companies such as Infosys and Wipro are storming international

markets. Meanwhile, the world's business people and investors queue up to lavish money on India's talented engineers and

computer scientists,

　　The roar from Delhi is echoing across Asia. After peevish[2] years cast as China's underperforming neighbour, the

huntress is now in hot pursuit. Over the past year the Indian economy has grown by an impressive 9.2%, not far behind

China's 10.4%. At some point this year India's growth rate could even outpace China's; and if you measure things by

purchasing power parity, India should soon overtake Japan and become the third-biggest economy, behind only America

and China.

　　No wonder an increasing number of Indian businessmen, policymakers and economists are basking[3] in the belief that

their country is burning bright having at last broken free of its bureaucratic cage. An economy once famous for the “Hindu rate

of growth”, of 3% a year, was opened up by the reforms of the 1990s, many of them pushed through by the man who is now

prime minister, Manmohan Singh. His government's latest five-year plan assumes that India can sustain average growth of

9%. Who can doubt “Incredible India”, to borrow the slogan of its tourism campaign?

Tweaking the long tail ”

　　Fast growth is essential to pull millions of Indians out of poverty, so it is sad to pour cold water on this story. But that is

precisely what is needed when there are so many alarming signs of overheating. Across India prices are rising fast, factories

are at full capacity, loans are piling up. Yes, the economic reforms of the early 1990s spurred competition, forced firms to

become more productive and boosted India's trend—or sustainable—rate of growth. But the problem is that this new speed

limit is almost certainly lower than the government's one. Historic data would suggest a figure not much above 7%—well

below China's 9-10%.

　　When you mention overheating, many analysts point towards China. Yet India displays far more symptoms of the

disease. Inflation has risen to 6-7% （compared with 2.8% in China）; a record 99% of Indian firms report that they are

operating above their optimal capacity; and credit is expanding at an annual rate of 30%, twice as fast as in China. Unlike

China, India also has a widening current-account deficit—a classic sign of overheating, as domestic output fails to keep pace

with surging demand. And if you are looking for a stockmarket bubble, Indian share prices have risen more than four-fold over

the past four years, far more than in China. If something is not done, then a hard landing will become inevitable.

　　The Reserve Bank of India has been too timid in cooling down domestic demand: although one interest rate was raised

this week by a quarter point, the overall rise in rates over the past two and a half years has not even kept up with consumer-

price inflation. But the main focus of the government's attention should be on supply—and dismantling[4] the many barriers

that keep its speed limit below China's.

　　So far, reform in India has focused on setting its inventive private sector free from the world's most fearsome

bureaucracy. This has unleashed[5] entrepreneurial talent, but more change is needed. Now is the time to tackle the public

sector itself. Infrastructure, such as roads and power, and public services, such as education and drinking water, are woefully

inadequate and limit growth. Even as the economy has been booming, many public services have worsened. It seems

incongruous that somebody can own a mobile phone, yet has to waste hours queuing for drinking water. India's top computer

scientists are feted[6] around the world, yet most children in rural areas lack the basic education needed to find more

productive work. Around half of all Indian women are illiterate, compared with a ratio of around one in seven in China.

Singh's songsheet

　　India's rulers have two bad excuses for not dealing with those roads, schools and hospitals. The first is theoretical. Many

Indian economic commentators say that further structural reforms, though desirable, are not essential to keep the economy

growing at 8% or more because of the “demographic dividend”. A fast-growing working population and a falling dependency

rate （thanks to a lower birth rate） will ensure more workers, more saving and hence more investment.

　　India's demographic structure is indeed starting to look more like that in East Asia when its growth took off. But this

本文标签： 印度读译参考赶超