admin管理员组文章数量:1532019
测试代码:
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <Windows.h>
#include <mutex>
#include <thread>
#include <vector>
#include <chrono>
#include <iostream>
const int tastCount = 160000;
int numThreads;
const int MAX_THREADS = 16;
double g_shmem = 8;
std::mutex g_mutex;
CRITICAL_SECTION g_critSec;
void sharedFunc(int i, double &data)
{
for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++)
{
if (j % 2 == 0)
data = sqrt(data);
else
data *= data;
}
}
void threadFuncCritSec() {
double lMem = 8;
int iterations = tastCount / numThreads;
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++)
sharedFunc(j, lMem);
EnterCriticalSection(&g_critSec);
sharedFunc(i, g_shmem);
LeaveCriticalSection(&g_critSec);
}
printf("results: %f\n", lMem);
}
void threadFuncMutex() {
double lMem = 8;
int iterations = tastCount / numThreads;
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++)
sharedFunc(j, lMem);
g_mutex.lock();
sharedFunc(i, g_shmem);
g_mutex.unlock();
}
printf("results: %f\n", lMem);
}
void testRound()
{
std::vector<std::thread> threads;
auto startMutex = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; ++i)
threads.push_back(std::thread(threadFuncMutex));
for (std::thread& thd : threads)
thd.join();
auto endMutex = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
std::cout << "std::mutex: ";
std::cout << std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(endMutex - startMutex).count();
std::cout << "ms \n\r";
threads.clear();
auto startCritSec = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; ++i)
threads.push_back(std::thread(threadFuncCritSec));
for (std::thread& thd : threads)
thd.join();
auto endCritSec = std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();
std::cout << "CRITICAL_SECTION: ";
std::cout << std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(endCritSec - startCritSec).count();
std::cout << "ms \n\r";
}
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) {
InitializeCriticalSection(&g_critSec);
std::cout << "Tasks: " << tastCount << "\n\r";
for (numThreads = 1; numThreads <= MAX_THREADS; numThreads = numThreads * 2) {
if (numThreads == 16)
numThreads = 12;
Sleep(100);
std::cout << "Thread count: " << numThreads << "\n\r";
testRound();
}
DeleteCriticalSection(&g_critSec);
return 0;
}
测试环境VS2013
测试结果:
Tasks: 160000
Thread count: 1
std::mutex: 12096ms
CRITICAL_SECTION: 12060ms
Thread count: 2
std::mutex: 5206ms
CRITICAL_SECTION: 5110ms
Thread count: 4
std::mutex: 2643ms
CRITICAL_SECTION: 2625ms
Thread count: 8
std::mutex: 1632ms
CRITICAL_SECTION: 1702ms
Thread count: 12
std::mutex: 1227ms
CRITICAL_SECTION: 1244ms
本文标签: 性能stdmutexCRITICALSECTION
版权声明:本文标题:std::mutex和CRITICAL_SECTION性能比较 内容由热心网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:https://m.elefans.com/dianzi/1726270222a1063734.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论