admin管理员组文章数量:1530842
2024年2月29日发(作者:)
Are human beings environment protectors or destroyers?
正方:
Considering the urgent need for environmental protection, we human beings have
taken initiative in improving the world we live in, which is the mainstream of the
society. And we firmly believe that development and protection are not mutually
exclusive. The United Nations Climate Change Conference 2011 is a case in point,
which indicates that awareness of environmental protection is gaining
momentum. What’s more, various organizations, private sectors and individuals
have dedicated themselves to this noble cause. So, the main trend is protection.
Therefore, human beings are environment protectors.
反方:
As we have stated, the detrimental effects of our actions on the natural
environment can not be ignored, even if there are some remedies in place. As for
those fancy conferences, they have not reached any practical resolutions that can be
implemented effectively. For instance, the Copenhagen Conference ended in failure.
Despite all these promises made by world leaders, no improvement is visible. So,
they do not really contribute to environmental protection. Also, awareness can not
complete itself, only actions matter. Human beings have crossed the threshold
limit set up by environment. Global warming, pollution, loss of natural resources,
human’s tinkering with the genes of various plants and animals…Don’t you think
these are damages?
正方:
Only with general, systematic guidelines can actions take effects. That’s the
importance of UNEP, Kyoto Protocol, and United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change. Besides, campaigns like Billion Tree Campaign, Climate Neutral
Network, and UNite to Combat Climate Change are in operation. At the same time,
we develop clean energies. Natural reservoirs in China have reached 15% of its
size, and woodstorage has spread to 4.574 billion m3
thanks for intensive
afforestation. All these are concrete steps to better the situation.
反方:
All the regulations and actions are taken after damages have been done. And are you
sure these steps have no adverse effect? How can you explain that the
wind turbine generator system is producing toxic substances in the process? From the
long run, we can not say for sure these measures are environmentally friendly.
正方:
These remarks sound reasonable. But defects cannot be little virtues. Can you deny
the fact that the positive impact of wind power and the like is in charge? Clean
energies are the products of human development, which aims to harmonies our
relations with the natural world.
反方:
But development does not mean excessive exploitation. Mankind is using up
natural resources at an alarming rate. Mining and the burning of fossil fuels have
led to further depletion of resources. Chinese oil demand for instance, is
projected to grow nearly 20% in the next six years. Oil and natural gases are
expected to get over by the end of this century. Introduction of invasive and
parasitic fauna and flora species to new areas and introduction of genetically modified
species have led to creation of new or worse viruses and unknown harms to the
environment. More recently, the World Meteorological Organization claimed that
the temperature this year is unusually high because of climate change. Natural
reservoirs are hopeless in saving extinct species. According to the Guardian,
species are becoming extinct at a speed around 1000 times faster than would
happen naturally.
正方:
But without human beings interference, dinosaurs also died out. Those extinct species
are the result of natural selection. On the other hand, a drop can not stand for the
whole ocean. Similarly, you can not condemn the whole human society as
destroyers because of individuals’ improper behaviors.
反方:
Similarly, you can not categorise the whole human society as protectors because of
individuals’ decent behaviours. Desertification, climate change etc are facts and they
are independent of man's will. In addition, if we hadn’t been off sustainable
development track, things would be much different.
正方:
The time is moving forward, and we can not live in the past. It is the same with
adolescent who has done something wrong in his teens. Isn’t it arbitrary to define him
in a totally negative way? As long as he has realized his flaws and correct them, then
his progress should be confirmed. The same goes for human society. So long as we
consciously discipline ourselves and devote to environment cause, we are
protecting the planet.
反方:
Really? But some mistakes have no compensation. Consider this. Provided that a kid
smashed a glass into pieces, then the kid glued them together. What will you call
the kid? A protector of the glass or a destroyer? What done is done, and can not
be undone.
版权声明:本文标题:Humans are environment destroyer? 人类是环境的破坏者? 内容由热心网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:https://m.elefans.com/xitong/1709204093a221954.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论