admin管理员组文章数量:1530919
2024年6月14日发(作者:)
外文翻译
Feminist Consciousness After the Women’s Movement
Barbara Epstein
There is no longer an organized feminist movement in the United States that
influences the lives and actions of millions of women and engages their political
support. There are many organizations, ranging from the National Organization for
Women to women’s caucuses in labor unions and professional groups, which fight for
women’s rights, and there are many more organizations, many of them including men
as well as women, whose priorities include women’s issues. But the mass women’s
movement of the late sixties, seventies, and early eighties no longer exists. Few,
among the many women who regard themselves as feminists, have anything to do
with feminist organizations other than reading about them in the newspapers. Young
women who are drawn to political activism do not, for the most part, join women’s
groups. They are much more likely to join anti corporate, anti globalization, or social
justice groups. These young women are likely to regard themselves as feminists, and
in the groups that they join a feminist perspective is likely to affect the way in which
issues are defined and addressed. But this is not the same thing as a mass movement
of women for gender equality. A similar dynamic has taken place in other circles as
well. There are now very large numbers of women who identify with feminism, or, if
they are reluctant to adopt that label, nevertheless expect to be treated as the equals of
men. And there are large numbers of men who support this view.
The extent of feminist or proto-feminist consciousness, by which I mean an
awareness of the inequality of women and a determination to resist it, that now exists
in the United States, is an accomplishment of the women’s movement. But it is also
something of an anomaly, since it is no longer linked to the movement that produced
it. When the first wave of the women’s movement in the United States went into
decline, after woman suffrage was won in 1921, feminism went into decline with it.
By the 1950s, feminism had almost entirely disappeared, not only as an organized
movement, but also as an ideology and a political and social sensibility. Even in the
early sixties, in the New Left, to describe oneself as a feminist was to invite raised
eyebrows and probably more extreme reactions. Now, for a second time in U.S.
history, the memory of a movement that engages the energy of very large numbers of
women is receding into the past. But this time feminist consciousness has if anything
become more widespread. This raises the question: what accounts for this difference?
How and what does feminism change when it becomes a cultural current rather than a
movement for social change?
In part this different history may have to do with the disparities between the first
and second waves of feminism. The first wave of feminism began, in the 1840s, as a
demand for women’s equality generally. The women’s movement emerged out of the
abolitionist movement, and at first feminism was part of an egalitarian worldview,
closely connected to antislavery and antiracism. But in the last decade of the
nineteenth century, and to an even greater degree over the first two decades of the
twentieth, mainstream feminism narrowed to the demand for woman suffrage.
Leading feminists, mostly middle- and upper-middle-class, native-born white women,
even made racist and anti-immigrant arguments for woman suffrage. Though the
women’s movement also included working-class women, many of them are socialists,
for whom feminism remained a part of a broader commitment to social equality, by
the second decade of the twentieth century, radicalism was a minor current within the
women’s movement. Emma Goldman, who combined determination to resist the
oppression of women with anticapitalist politics, was not typical of feminists of the
first two decades of the century. For most feminists, and for the public, feminism had
come to mean the vote for women and little more. Once suffrage was won, feminism
lost its raison d’etre and so had little future either as a movement or as consciousness.
The second wave of the women’s movement turned out differently. It did not
narrow ideologically, nor did it run into any dead end, as its predecessor had. If
anything over time the radical currents within the movement gained influence; women
who had entered the movement thinking that women’s equality would not require
major social changes tended to become convinced that gender inequality was linked to
other dimensions of inequality, especially class and race. The women’s movement
declined, in the eighties and nineties, mostly because the constituency on which it had
been largely based, young, mostly white, middle-class women, gradually put political
activity behind them. These women were beneficiaries of, what John Kenneth
Galbraith has called, the “culture of contentment” of the eighties and nineties.
They benefited, along with the rest of the class, from the prosperity of the time;
they also benefited from affirmative action. Even as they left political activity, few
feminists thought that the aims of the women’s movement had been accomplished.
Many thought that they could continue to work towards these aims in the arenas,
mostly professional, that they were entering. Feminist consciousness was sustained in
版权声明:本文标题:女性意识外文翻译 内容由热心网友自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人, 转载请联系作者并注明出处:https://m.elefans.com/dianzi/1718332410a667748.html, 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
发表评论