雅思大作文国际

admin管理员组

文章数量:1532186

2024年6月15日发(作者：)

Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure

healthy and sustainable development. Some people think that financial aid is important.

Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important. Discuss both these views

and give your own opinion.

立场：两者都很必要，同时给出指导和帮助更能有效改善这些国家的状况

正方：经济援助帮助这些国家修缮基础设施

反方：真正需要的人不一定能拿到经济援助，而建议和指导会让这些国家更好的运用援助

Some people think that financial aid will benefit these developing countries more than practical

aid and advice. I believe that both financial and practical aid are important, however I think that

practical aid is more important, as developing countries must be taught how to best use the

financial aid they receive.

There is no doubt that developing countries can benefit from financial aid. This aid can help fund

the building of schools and education systems, the construction of roads and bridges, and the

financing of business start-ups and expansions. On the other hand, detractors will point out that

financial aid from international organizations often times does not reach the people or parties for

whom it is intended. That financial aid, without the practical aid to accompany it, may be subject

to wasteful spending or worse, corruption.

Practical aid and advice can provide the groundwork for a more sustainable economy, also for

the more efficient use of funds and resources. As an example, an international organization that

provided corn to a developing country in the hopes that the people there would plant the corn

and create a sustainable food source. Instead, the people ate the corn. What was intended to

be a sustainable food source instead became a one-time food donation. The people of the

developing country were lacking the practical knowledge regarding what to do with the corn and

how to make it a sustainable food source.

Although financial aid is certainly beneficial to a developing country the benefit of that aid will not

be sustainable unless it is accompanied by practical advice and knowledge in regards to how to

use hose funds.

其他观点

It is quite common to provide international aid to poor countries these days. Some people think

financial support is more important than practical aid. I believe that if these aids should be

combined with each other in order to achieve the best beneficial results.

Financial funds given directly to developing countries may pose a threat to the society and cause

many related problems, like corruption. Countries that receive funds on a regular basis may

develop a reliance on this source of finance. Also, authorities will take advantage of this

opportunity and try to use the money for other purposes. In the end, citizens in developing

countries cannot enjoy the benefit of these financial aids.

Practical aid and advice, on the other hand, may contribute more. International organizations

can build public facilities schools, libraries to offer locals opportunities to receive education in

order to find jobs in the future. The positive effects may not be seen in a short period of time, but

in the long run, the educated workforce will break their country's reliance on financial aid from

other countries and boost their economy independently.

In my opinion, I believe that financial aid and for sustainable development are equally important

for people in developing countries. International organizations can support these financially

struggling countries with funds especially when their citizens are suffering from serious problems

like famine. While if it is not in an emergent situation. Instead of asking for money, many of these

countries truly need technicians to teach them how to build power plants and dams. So, donators

may double check with recipients and make sure that the aid is what they really need.

Some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries with other types

of help rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

立场：强烈赞成

正方：经济援助使用妥当，会让贫穷国家的经济更健康的发展

反方：长期来看，单给钱不一定能是最好的，应辅以其他的援助，比如：科技，财政指导

Some people believe that it would be better for rich countries to provide poorer countries with

types of aid other than just financial aid. I agree strongly with that premise.

There is no doubt that poorer countries can benefit from financial aid. Money is required to build

and maintain a healthy economy in any country. Financial aid, if used wisely and effectively, can

become the lifeblood of any economy that aims to be self-sustaining.

That being said, other forms of aid may be more effective in guaranteeing the long-term success

and sustenance of the developing country's economy. Other forms of aid might include

technological aid or expertise, manpower, financial and educational expertise etc. Countries

would be able to use technological aid to become more relevant in the worldwide market. They

could use educational expertise to develop education systems which will allow for the country to

educate its young people and eventually reap the economical benefits of an educated society.

The developing countries could use the financial expertise offered by other countries to

determine how best to use their financial resources and how best to develop financial plans and

systems that will encourage a prosperous economy.

In conclusion financial aid offered by richer countries to poorer countries can be vital for those

poorer countries as they try to develop vibrant and sustainable economies. However, that being

said, richer countries might be better served to offer other types of help other than just financial

help, or relevant help to accompany the financial aid they are offering.

其他观点

Financial aids to developing nations provided by developed countries are quite common in the

本文标签： 国家经济援助帮助指导立场